Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
researchsquare; 2022.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-1608319.v1

ABSTRACT

Background: The efficacy and safety of complement inhibition in Covid-19 patients is unclear.Methods: A multicenter randomized controlled, open-label trial. Hospitalized Covid-19 patients with signs of hyperinflammation and hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 below 350 mHg) were randomized (2:1 ratio) to receive standard of care with or without the C5 inhibitor zilucoplan daily for 14 days, under antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome was improvement in oxygenation at day 6 and 15.Results: 81 patients were randomly assigned to zilucoplan (n=55) or the control group (n=26). 78 patients were included in the safety and primary analysis. Most  were men (87%) and the median age was 63 years. The mean improvement in PaO2/FiO2 from baseline to day 6 was 56·4 mmHg in the zilucoplan group and 20·6 mmHg in the control group (mean difference +35.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) -9.4 to 80.9; p=0.12), an effect also observed  at day 15. Day 28 mortality was 9% in the zilucoplan and 21% in the control group (odds ratio 0·4; 95% CI 0·1 to 1·5) At long-term follow up, the distance walked in a 6 min test was 539·7 m in zilucoplan and 490·6 m in the control group (p=0·18). Zilucoplan lowered serum C5b-9 (p<0·001) and interleukin-8 (p=0·03) concentration compared with control. No relevant safety differences between the zilucoplan and control group were identified.Conclusion: Administration of zilucoplan to Covid-19 patients in this proof-of-concept randomized trial was well tolerated under antibiotic prophylaxis. While not reaching statistical significance, indicators of respiratory function and clinical outcome suggest that C5 inhibition might be beneficial, although this requires further research in larger randomized studies.(Funded by UCB and Ghent University Special Research Fund for COVID-19 Research; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04382755 – May 11, 2020; EudraCT, 2020-002130-33 – May 6, 2020)


Subject(s)
COVID-19
2.
researchsquare; 2021.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-959220.v1

ABSTRACT

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) instructs monocytes to differentiate into alveolar macrophages (AM) that preserve lung homeostasis. By comparing AM development in mouse and human, we discovered that COVID-19 patients showed marked defects in GM-CSF-dependent AM instruction. The multi-center, open-label, randomized, controlled SARPAC-trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of 5 days of inhalation of rhu-GM-CSF (sargramostim, Leukine®) in 81 non-ventilated patients with COVID-19 and hypoxemic respiratory failure identified by PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 350mmHg. At day 6, more patients in the sargramostim group experienced at least 25% improvement in oxygenation compared with the standard of care group. Higher numbers of circulating class-switched B cells and effector virus-specific CD8 lymphocytes were found in the sargramostim group. Treatment adverse events, including signs of cytokine storm, were not different between active and control group. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of inhaled GM-CSF in restoring alveolar gas exchange, while simultaneously boosting anti-COVID-19 immunity. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04326920).


Subject(s)
Macrophage Activation Syndrome , Lung Injury , COVID-19 , Respiratory Insufficiency
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL